Comments for Schaffer Law Library Blog

Comment on NY No-fault divorce law by Diana

Diana — Sun, 19 Sep 2010 20:54:48 +0000

Wondering what the outlook is for permanent spousal maintance in the new no fault divorce law, as the wording in the original bill was removed on this regard.

Comment on HeinOnline update by Jill Parsons

Jill Parsons — Tue, 27 Oct 2009 17:50:48 +0000

Hi Kristin,
Our licensing agreement with Hein restricts access to current students, faculty and staff.

Comment on HeinOnline update by Kristin Wheaton

Kristin Wheaton — Tue, 27 Oct 2009 01:14:54 +0000

I am an alumni from 1994. Can I obtain a password to access HeinOnline or is it restricted to current law students only? thank you.

Comment on New Books by euandus

euandus — Thu, 22 Oct 2009 15:46:22 +0000

On Federalism and industry: I suspect that the latest compromise regarding state banking regulation points to the influence of large corporations on the Congress as a culprit in the on-going eclipse of federalism. I have just posted on this, in case you are interested.

Comment on Uniform bar exam? by Jill Parsons

Jill Parsons — Thu, 15 Oct 2009 19:57:19 +0000

The posts aren’t saying specifically, just that 10 states are expected to come on board.

Comment on Uniform bar exam? by Heather Anonymous

Heather Anonymous — Wed, 14 Oct 2009 20:48:45 +0000

so which are the 10 states?

Comment on Celebrate Judge Sotomayor’s appointment, right here at Albany Law! by Lori

Lori — Mon, 05 Oct 2009 16:36:53 +0000

It is a great inspiration and encouragement to have Justice Sonia Sotomayor on the Supreme Court. Congratulations and God bless you and your Justice member’s. May your service be an honor.

Comment on Post-release supervision issue by wiegand,R

wiegand,R — Sat, 19 Sep 2009 00:25:10 +0000

Post release supervision is as unconstitutional as imposing an order to eliminate the right to bear arms as guaranteed by by the 2nd. amend. of the u.s. const.N.Y. penal law sections 55-55.10 do not classify P.R.S. as a felony or misdemeanor. To be past your max. date and inccur an alleged parole violation,which there should not be, is a blatant violation of your const. rights. there is only one true maximum expiration date, and that is the agreed upon sentence through plea bargain or whatever sentence the judge imposes after guilty verdict via jury trial.The UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT HOLDING IN JONES V. THE U.S. 526, CLEARLY UPHOLDS AND WAS COMMANDED THAT ” ALL STATES WHO ADOPTED LAWS UNDER UNDER U.S.S.G P.L.90-483, TO SCRAP IT AND START ALL OVER. ESTABLISHES NO RIGHTS, CONFERS NO POWERS. THIS IS THE FATHERING PREDECESSOR OF POST-RELEASE SUPERVISION. I have much more to say but i will let the judge decide that in the EASTERN DISTRICT FEDERAL COURT WHICH IM CURRENTLY IN NOW FIGHTING THIS CASE. WHAT BAFFLES ME IS THE SIMPLE FACT THAT NOWHERE IN NEW YORK STATE NOBODY IS FIGHTING THE STATUTE ITS SELF, EXCEPT BY BEING IMPOSED BY DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS. OR THE JUDGE NOT IMPOSING IT DURING SENTENCING. WHY IS NOBODY CHALLENGING THE STATUTE P.L.70.45 EXCEPT ME? thats the MILLION DOLLAR QUESTION? if you can answer this then send your questions and comments to: rdwreal@gmail.com i will look foward to hearing from anybody who has an idea what they are talking about regarding this matter.