1L Survival Guide

December 1, 2008 at 10:34 am | In General Interest, Legal Research 101 | Leave a Comment
Tags: , ,

1L and laptops

November 21, 2008 at 1:03 pm | In General Interest, Just for Fun | Leave a Comment
Tags: ,

An interesting post about a robber, a 1L and a laptop.

Thanks to the Taking the law into my own hands blog.

What’s the answer?

August 28, 2008 at 10:24 am | In Just for Fun | Leave a Comment
Tags: ,

From the Volokh Conspiracy: Advice for 1Ls: What If You Don’t Know the Answer?

Many first-year law students worry about being called on in class. What might happen if the professor asks a question that the student just can’t answer? Here are a few thoughts on what to do, depending on the nature of the question.

  1) Reciting the case. Sometimes a professor asks a question about the facts or the analysis in the case. They’re trying to get students to identify and wrestle with the key parts of the opinion, and they’re asking the student to remember what the opinion said. As a student, sometimes you just can’t answer: You read the case earlier on, but you don’t remember the part your professor has in mind.

  What to do? If you really don’t know the answer, I think you should just say so. You might say, “I don’t recall that from the opinion” or just “I don’t remember that.” The alternative is to pretend that you know the answer. You could just guess, or you could start scanning the opinion in the unlikely chance you’ll see the point in a second or two. But these alternatives usually don’t work. If you guess incorrectly you’ll probably look a bit silly, and everyone can tell when a student is staring at the page for a long time. Just be straightfoward and acknowledge politely that you don’t know the answer.

  2) Applying the rule. Sometimes a professor will ask students how a legal rule would apply to a hypothetical case. You know the rule and you understand the facts, but you’re just not sure how the facts would apply.

  What to do? I think you should explain your uncertainty. To the extent you can, articulate why you’re unsure. You might say, “I’m not exactly sure how the rule would apply. On one hand, it seems that the rule would apply like this [fill in details]. But on the other hand, there’s a detail that seems to point the other way because [fill in details].” Articulating why a hypothetical is hard is a really essential skill: It’s the same skill you’ll need to show on an exam to get a high grade. Continue reading What’s the answer?…

Add an E to Your IRAC

August 18, 2008 at 9:18 am | In Legal Scholarship and Professional Development | Leave a Comment
Tags: ,

From the Law Librarian Blog: “Mark Wojcik’s (John Marshall Law School, Chicago) explains why adding an E for “explanation” of the rule of law to IRAC will help legal writers get their point across to professors and judges in his brief Student Lawyer article, Add an E to Your IRAC [SSRN]. Readers are more likely to accept one’s argument when a writer can demonstrate that it is consistent with the rule’s purpose. In his article, Wojcik identifies three ways to explain rules of law. The article is an excellent handout for 1L legal research and writing classes.”

Blog at WordPress.com. | Theme: Pool by Borja Fernandez.
Entries and comments feeds.